BlogBACK TO OVERVIEW
22 September 2014
EU Ombudsman opens public consultation on transparency in TTIP
The office of the EU Ombudsman has announced a public consultation in relation to transparency and public participation in TTIP, as part of one of two own-initiative inquiries launched on July 29 against the Council and Commission.
Organisations and civil society will have until October 31 2014 to submit proposals to the Ombudsman’s office that relate specifically to Commission efforts to enhance transparency and public participation in the ongoing talks. In a press release, released on Friday, the Ombudsman’s office said:
‘The outcome of the TTIP negotiations could have a significant impact on the lives of citizens. The aim of the Ombudsman's inquiry is to help ensure that the public can follow the progress of these talks and contribute to shaping their outcome.’
On July 29, Emily O’Reilly wrote to the Commission outlining the scope of the inquiry, noting that ‘what is of particular concern to me is the extent to which the public can follow the progress of these talks and contribute to shaping their outcome.’ She included a list of questions and suggestions which she has requested answers to from the Commission by October 31.
This public consultation will allow citizens to also feed into the Ombudsman's inquiry, and should provide her with new perspectives on the issue of transparency around these talks. In an effort to have it completed by December 31, O’Reilly has highlighted 3 areas that the public should focus on in their submissions:
1. Please give us your views on what concrete measures the Commission could take to make the TTIP negotiations more transparent. Where, specifically, do you see room for improvement? (We would ask you to be as concrete as possible in your replies and also to consider the feasibility of your suggestions, in light of the timeframe of the negotiations. It would be most helpful if you could prioritise your suggestions.)
2. Please provide examples of best practice that you have encountered in this area (for example, in particular Commission Directorates-General or other international organisations) that you believe could be applied throughout the Commission.
3. Please explain how, in your view, greater transparency might affect the outcome of the negotiations.
Such feedback could prove invaluable for any final conclusions garnered from the Ombudsman’s inquiry, and may help to alter the way in which such negotiations take place in the years ahead.
The lack of transparency around the TTIP talks has come under fire by many MEPs and civil society since negotiations began last year. Although the Commission has released a number of documents that relate to the talks, key negotiation documents are not open to the public, and only a handful of officials and MEPs can view the ‘consolidated texts’ in secure reading rooms in Brussels. The Council failed to agree on the release of the EU mandate for the talks in May, despite a request to do so from the Commission, and a full draft having been leaked online. There has also been no access available to US position texts in any area of the talks.
Last year a report by the Corporate Europe Observatory showed that 93% of the Commission’s preparatory meetings in the run up to the negotiations were held with industry representatives, which has given rise to speculation that the talks are heavily weighted toward business interests over that of the public good.
The Ombudsman's consultation also comes following a recent public consultation on investor rights in TTIP organised by the Commission. It received a record-breaking number of responses, most of which now look set to be discounted, as out-going Trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht has dismissed the use of identicial answers to questions.
You can find more detail on the EU Ombudsman’s website here.